Borough bike park sparks debate

THE Borough of Queenscliffe’s bid to build a more sustainable bike park has been met with the disapproval of more than 100 residents.

Earlier this year the former Queenscliff High School was earmarked as a potential location for the park, with the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning identifying the large vacant site as suitable for development.

Fearful of the cultural impact the park would have, residents rallied together to formulate a petition against the proposed site containing 101 signatures.

“The High School site forms an iconic entrance to Queenscliff, with important vistas through to Swan Bay and eastward along the Avenue of Honour and Memorial Garden,” it reads.

“A bike park at this site does not align with the ongoing work to restore and promote these two heritage memorials.”

The high school location has been the subject of numerous proposals in the past, with previous community consultations undertaken in 2014 to transform the area into a community garden.

“One of Queenscliff’s key characteristics is its low-key historic profile which is important to residents, visitors and businesses alike,” the petition states.

“This attribute differentiates the town from other Bellarine and Surf Coast destinations, and it should be carefully maintained and encouraged.”

The proposal for a new bike park comes after the borough shut down numerous riding tracks in the region considered to be a threat to coastal vegetation.

The borough confirmed it was now seeking to collaborate with local riders in the development of the park, with stage one of public submissions opening up last month.

“We know you’re creative and passionate, so we want your ideas to make sure we get the design right for this new park,” it said.

“Some of our local riders are looking for something more challenging, so we are looking into options for a more substantial bike track in the borough.

“We appreciate everyone’s help protecting our coastal vegetation while we get started on this project.” The petition opposing the location will be considered during the next council meeting scheduled for March 24.