New research from the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) has found that one third of first-time buyers are opting to invest rather than to buy a home.<\/p>\n
The 2018 PIPA Investor Sentiment Survey found that about 36 percent of first-time buyers had opted to invest in property and continue to rent instead of buying a home to live in over the past 12 months.<\/p>\n
PIPA chair Peter Koulizos said while it was the first time that specific question had been asked in the annual survey, one could presume that rentvesting as an investment strategy had been a trend for some time.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat this insight shows us is that first-time property buyers generally have probably been more active over recent years than official statistics originally recorded,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) publicly admitted issues with first home buyer statistics from 2012 to 2016, in part due to some lenders only reporting loans to first home buyers who received a First Home Owner Grant.<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course, most grants were restricted to first-timers buying a new property as their home not as an investment many years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to the latest ABS statistics, about 18 percent of dwellings financed in Australia were to first-time buyers in September.<\/p>\n
Mr Koulizos said revisions to the official data meant that first-time investors were now being counted, however, issues could reportedly still persist in the statistics according to the ABS.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere’s no doubt that the softer market conditions are making it easier for first-time buyers when it comes to purchase prices, however, lending restrictions are conversely making it more difficult for them to secure finance,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cOn top of this, it appears that recent political assertions that first-time buyers are only one in seven purchases \u2013 or 14 percent \u2013 is factually incorrect.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt seems that the dream of property ownership has remained alive and well for some time, with many first-timers opting to improve their financial futures by investing in more affordable locations while renting elsewhere.\u201d<\/p>\n
The survey also found that the vast\u00a0majority of first-time buyers had opted to buy an existing property, even with state government grants available to purchase a new dwelling.<\/p>\n
\u201cAbout 83 percent of first-timers purchased existing property with only 14 percent buying new or off-the-plan,\u201d Mr Koulizos said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is partly due to affordability considerations with established properties generally available for lower prices points than new, plus the majority of all investors always prefer existing properties.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mr Koulizos said this was yet another\u00a0reason why proposals to change negative gearing policy to supposedly increase supply were ill-conceived as most investors buy established property and pay little regard to new property.<\/p>\n
\u201cEstablished property has greater capital growth and any tax benefits associated with new property generally doesn’t make up for comparably poorer price performance over the long-term,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
New research from the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) has found that one third of first-time buyers are opting to invest rather than to buy a home. The 2018 PIPA Investor Sentiment Survey found that about 36 percent of first-time buyers had opted to invest in property and continue to rent instead of buying […]<\/p>\n