MINISTER for Agriculture David Littleproud will change the definition of lamb for export purposes, matching the New Zealand definition and removing the unfair advantage NZ producers had over our farmers.<\/p>\n
Lamb had previously been considered to have grown into the less lucrative \u201chogget\u201d or mutton as soon as incisor teeth were visible \u2013 but in NZ, lamb were still considered lamb after two teeth had popped through.<\/p>\n
The issue of the Australian definition had been debated for decades.<\/p>\n
\u201cLamb will continue to be called lamb when the animal has two permanent incisor teeth, so long as those teeth are new and have not begun to wear,\u201d Minister Littleproud said.<\/p>\n
\u201cOur export definition will now match New Zealand\u2019s definition and our own new AUS-MEAT definition.<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter decades of discussion, the time for talk was over, this is a simple common-sense change.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis will mean our growers can sell more lambs towards the end of the growing season and expand their lamb export opportunities.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt will be easy for growers to see when a lamb becomes a sheep \u2013 when there is visible wear on the incisors.\u201d<\/p>\n
The change will require amendment to the Export Control (Meat and Meat Products) Orders 2005, to change the definition of what constitutes lamb.<\/p>\n
Research by Meat and Livestock Australia found no discernible difference in eating quality between lambs immediately prior to incisor teeth and immediately afterwards.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
MINISTER for Agriculture David Littleproud will change the definition of lamb for export purposes, matching the New Zealand definition and removing the unfair advantage NZ producers had over our farmers. Lamb had previously been considered to have grown into the less lucrative \u201chogget\u201d or mutton as soon as incisor teeth were visible \u2013 but in […]<\/p>\n